Dozens of changes expected for theme park plans

Theme park developers will make dozens of changes to their plans after the proposed location was protected as a wildlife haven, documents show.

A planning inspector is due to examine the plans to build the London Resort in Swanscombe Peninsula later this year.

Developers said they are making no “material” changes, but wildlife charities have urged them to pull out.

After being granted a four-month delay, the London Resort Company Holdings (LRCH) has revealed it plans to alter nearly half of the 460 documents submitted as part of the application.

Eleven documents will be replaced or receive “substantive” updates, with 46 taking “some amendments” and about 160 expected to receive “minor amendments,” a letter to the planning inspectorate shows.

About 250 documents will receive no changes.

“There is so much change here it is hard to argue that it doesn’t warrant re-submission and fresh consultation,” said Buglife’s Jamie Robins, one of the authors of the letter.

LRCH should look at other locations, because “you cannot replace these habitats,” he said.

The Save Swanscombe Peninsula campaign said it appeared LRCH were “using the extension as an opportunity to try and address big holes in the original application and not just regards their devastating impact on biodiversity”.

The company said it had not considered moving to another site, but was “reviewing and revising reports where necessary”.

Chief executive Pierre-Yves Gerbeau said the “mood is incredibly upbeat” and they “still expect to begin construction in 2022” if the plans are approved.

He said it was “absolutely fundamental for us to be leaders in sustainability,” adding that £150m had pledged for “remediation, habitat enhancement and providing around 8 miles of footpaths and public rights of way”.

A six-month examination by the planning inspectorate will not begin until revised documents are submitted in September, with a final decision expected in 2022.

The application is being considered as a nationally significant infrastructure project, which means the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government will ultimately decide whether to grant a development consent order.